Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Eritrea ranks 137th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Eritrea ranks 137th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.