Equatorial Guinea vs Georgia: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Equatorial Guinea
0.0%
in 2015
Georgia
0.0%
in 2015
Equatorial Guinea rank
139th
Georgia rank
138th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Georgia ranks 138th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Equatorial Guinea or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Georgia rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Georgia ranks 138th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.