Libya vs Slovakia: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Libya
0.1%
in 2015
Slovakia
0.1%
in 2015
Libya rank
123rd
Slovakia rank
121st

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Libya
  • Slovakia
00.020.040.060.080.1199020022015

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Libya, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovakia ahead.

Libya ranks 123rd and Slovakia ranks 121st of 217 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Slovakia
2000s 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Libya
2010s 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Libya or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Libya as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Libya and Slovakia?
0.0%, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Slovakia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Libya and Slovakia rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Libya ranks 123rd and Slovakia ranks 121st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.