Malawi vs Tunisia: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Malawi
0.1%
in 2015
Tunisia
0.1%
in 2015
Malawi rank
113th
Tunisia rank
115th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 217 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Malawi, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Tunisia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 0.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Malawi ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.