Mauritania vs Tajikistan: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Mauritania
0.1%
in 2015
Tajikistan
0.1%
in 2015
Mauritania rank
122nd
Tajikistan rank
124th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Mauritania
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 124th of 217 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Mauritania or Tajikistan?
- Mauritania, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Tajikistan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 0.0%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Mauritania and Tajikistan rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Mauritania ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 124th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.