Montserrat vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Montserrat
0.0%
in 2015
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0%
in 2015
Montserrat rank
204th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
206th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Montserrat
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Montserrat currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Montserrat ahead.
Montserrat ranks 204th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 206th of 217 countries.
Montserrat has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montserrat | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Montserrat |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Montserrat |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Montserrat |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Montserrat or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Montserrat, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Montserrat and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0%, with Montserrat ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Montserrat and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Montserrat ranks 204th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 206th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.