Netherlands Antilles vs Western Sahara: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Netherlands Antilles
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Netherlands Antilles currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Netherlands Antilles's figure about 1.4 times Western Sahara's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Netherlands Antilles ranks 164th and Western Sahara ranks 167th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Netherlands Antilles averaged higher in 2 and Western Sahara in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands Antilles | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Western Sahara |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Netherlands Antilles |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Netherlands Antilles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Netherlands Antilles or Western Sahara?
- Netherlands Antilles, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Western Sahara as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Netherlands Antilles and Western Sahara?
- 0.0%, with Netherlands Antilles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands Antilles and Western Sahara?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Netherlands Antilles and Western Sahara rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Netherlands Antilles ranks 164th and Western Sahara ranks 167th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.