Costa Rica vs Philippines: Sorghum — Crop residues
Sorghum — Crop residues over time
- Costa Rica
- Philippines
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Philippines, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0003 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.001 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sorghum — crop residues, Costa Rica or Philippines?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Philippines as of 1991.
- What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues between Costa Rica and Philippines?
- 0 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Philippines?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1991.
- How do Costa Rica and Philippines rank globally for sorghum — crop residues?
- Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sorghum — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).