Myanmar vs Serbia: Soya beans — Crop residues
Soya beans — Crop residues over time
- Myanmar
- Serbia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.1524 kt against 0.1159 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.0365 kt.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 19th of 98 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0751 kt | 0.0936 kt | 0.0185 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0613 kt | 0.1253 kt | 0.0639 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0526 kt | 0.1481 kt | 0.0955 kt | Serbia |
| 2030s | 0.1161 kt | 0.1049 kt | 0.0112 kt | Myanmar |
| 2050s | 0.1524 kt | 0.1159 kt | 0.0365 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soya beans — crop residues, Myanmar or Serbia?
- Myanmar, at 0.1524 kt against 0.1159 kt in Serbia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues between Myanmar and Serbia?
- 0.0365 kt, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2050.
- How do Myanmar and Serbia rank globally for soya beans — crop residues?
- Myanmar ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 19th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).