El Salvador vs Peru: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

El Salvador
0.1401 kt
in 2050
Peru
0.1482 kt
in 2050
El Salvador rank
34th
Peru rank
31st

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • El Salvador
  • Peru
0.050.0750.10.1250.15196120052050

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.1482 kt against 0.1401 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0081 kt.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

El Salvador ranks 34th and Peru ranks 31st of 103 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0467 kt 0.098 kt 0.0514 kt Peru
1970s 0.0655 kt 0.1079 kt 0.0423 kt Peru
1980s 0.0619 kt 0.1105 kt 0.0486 kt Peru
1990s 0.0975 kt 0.0982 kt 0.0007 kt Peru
2000s 0.1095 kt 0.1195 kt 0.0099 kt Peru
2010s 0.1334 kt 0.146 kt 0.0126 kt Peru
2020s 0.1369 kt 0.1457 kt 0.0088 kt Peru
2030s 0.1284 kt 0.1448 kt 0.0164 kt Peru
2050s 0.1401 kt 0.1482 kt 0.0081 kt Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, El Salvador or Peru?
Peru, at 0.1482 kt against 0.1401 kt in El Salvador as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between El Salvador and Peru?
0.0081 kt, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
El Salvador ranks 34th and Peru ranks 31st of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Peru: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/peru/">El Salvador vs Peru: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).