Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Sri Lanka
0.0403 kt
in 2050
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0297 kt
in 2050
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
57th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.020.040.060.08196120052050

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0403 kt against 0.0297 kt in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0106 kt.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.4 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 57th of 103 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0103 kt 0.0615 kt 0.0512 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0087 kt 0.0632 kt 0.0545 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0284 kt 0.0391 kt 0.0107 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0392 kt 0.0412 kt 0.0021 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0301 kt 0.0293 kt 0.0008 kt Sri Lanka
2030s 0.0341 kt 0.0291 kt 0.005 kt Sri Lanka
2050s 0.0403 kt 0.0297 kt 0.0106 kt Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Sri Lanka or Trinidad and Tobago?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0403 kt against 0.0297 kt in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0106 kt, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 57th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).