Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0162 kt
in 2050
Central America
0.0527 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Central America rank
13th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central America
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

Central America currently reports 0.0527 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0365 kt.

That makes Central America's figure about 3.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Central America ranks 13th of 103 countries.

Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.009 kt 0.0283 kt 0.0193 kt Central America
1970s 0.0115 kt 0.0352 kt 0.0237 kt Central America
1980s 0.0141 kt 0.0394 kt 0.0253 kt Central America
1990s 0.0166 kt 0.0445 kt 0.0279 kt Central America
2000s 0.0189 kt 0.0519 kt 0.033 kt Central America
2010s 0.0175 kt 0.0618 kt 0.0443 kt Central America
2020s 0.0159 kt 0.0628 kt 0.0469 kt Central America
2030s 0.0186 kt 0.0552 kt 0.0366 kt Central America
2050s 0.0162 kt 0.0527 kt 0.0365 kt Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Central America?
Central America, at 0.0527 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
0.0365 kt, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central America rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Central America ranks 13th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).