Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia
0.0162 kt
in 2050
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.0668 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
13th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0.0668 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia, a difference of 0.0506 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.1 times Australia's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 103 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.009 kt 0.0139 kt 0.0049 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 0.0115 kt 0.0212 kt 0.0097 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 0.0141 kt 0.0293 kt 0.0152 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 0.0166 kt 0.0287 kt 0.0121 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 0.0189 kt 0.0311 kt 0.0122 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 0.0175 kt 0.0396 kt 0.022 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 0.0159 kt 0.0431 kt 0.0272 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2030s 0.0186 kt 0.0474 kt 0.0288 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2050s 0.0162 kt 0.0668 kt 0.0506 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0.0668 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
0.0506 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).