Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Mauritius
0.0063 kt
in 2050
Northern America
0.0156 kt
in 2050
Mauritius rank
23rd
Northern America rank
20th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Mauritius
  • Northern America
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 0.0156 kt against 0.0063 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0093 kt.

That makes Northern America's figure about 2.5 times Mauritius's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 23rd and Northern America ranks 20th of 103 countries.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 kt 0.0106 kt 0.0069 kt Northern America
1970s 0.0036 kt 0.0132 kt 0.0095 kt Northern America
1980s 0.0035 kt 0.0144 kt 0.0109 kt Northern America
1990s 0.0034 kt 0.0169 kt 0.0135 kt Northern America
2000s 0.0031 kt 0.0174 kt 0.0143 kt Northern America
2010s 0.0024 kt 0.0165 kt 0.0141 kt Northern America
2020s 0.0018 kt 0.0172 kt 0.0154 kt Northern America
2030s 0.0048 kt 0.016 kt 0.0112 kt Northern America
2050s 0.0063 kt 0.0156 kt 0.0093 kt Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Northern America?
Northern America, at 0.0156 kt against 0.0063 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Northern America?
0.0093 kt, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Northern America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and Northern America rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Mauritius ranks 23rd and Northern America ranks 20th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/northern-america/">Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).