Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Puerto Rico
0.0001 kt
in 2002
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Puerto Rico rank
82nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
82nd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0020.0040.006196120052050

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd of 103 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0051 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0049 kt Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0024 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0022 kt Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0011 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0009 kt Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0006 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0004 kt Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Puerto Rico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2002.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kt, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Puerto Rico ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).