Aruba vs South Sudan: Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions
Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions over time
- Aruba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 189th and South Sudan ranks 189th of 199 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.0005 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0053 kt | 0.0052 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher synthetic fertilizers — emissions, Aruba or South Sudan?
- Aruba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in synthetic fertilizers — emissions between Aruba and South Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and South Sudan rank globally for synthetic fertilizers — emissions?
- Aruba ranks 189th and South Sudan ranks 189th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf