Lithuania vs Sudan: Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (N2O)
Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Lithuania
- Sudan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.51 kt against 2.51 kt in Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 88th and Sudan ranks 89th of 232 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.39 kt | 2.02 kt | 1.37 kt | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 3.29 kt | 3.18 kt | 0.1056 kt | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher synthetic fertilizers — emissions, Lithuania or Sudan?
- Lithuania, at 2.51 kt against 2.51 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in synthetic fertilizers — emissions between Lithuania and Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Sudan rank globally for synthetic fertilizers — emissions?
- Lithuania ranks 88th and Sudan ranks 89th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf