Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Grenada: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Grenada
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.8 against 3.7 in Grenada, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Grenada ranks 98th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.29 | 1.76 | 2.53 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 3.92 | 2.83 | 1.08 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Grenada?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.8 against 3.7 in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada?
- 0.1, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Grenada rank globally for vulnerability?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Grenada ranks 98th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.