Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Central African Republic
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 8 against 7.7 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.3.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 9th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.6 | 7.41 | 1.19 | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 8.4 | 7.88 | 0.5167 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Central African Republic or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Central African Republic, at 8 against 7.7 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0.3, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for vulnerability?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 9th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.