Japan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Japan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.5 against 1.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Japan ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.3 | 1.46 | 0.1571 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 1.33 | 1.62 | 0.2833 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Japan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Japan, at 1.5 against 1.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Japan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for vulnerability?
- Japan ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.