South Korea vs Maldives: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- South Korea
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1.7 against 1.5 in South Korea, a difference of 0.2.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 177th and Maldives ranks 174th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1 | 1.99 | 0.8857 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 1.35 | 1.82 | 0.4667 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, South Korea or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 1.7 against 1.5 in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between South Korea and Maldives?
- 0.2, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Maldives?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Maldives rank globally for vulnerability?
- South Korea ranks 177th and Maldives ranks 174th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.