Liechtenstein vs United Arab Emirates: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Liechtenstein
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 1 against 1 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 186th and United Arab Emirates ranks 186th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.775 | 1 | 0.225 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0.8833 | 1 | 0.1167 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Liechtenstein or United Arab Emirates?
- Liechtenstein, at 1 against 1 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Liechtenstein and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Liechtenstein and United Arab Emirates rank globally for vulnerability?
- Liechtenstein ranks 186th and United Arab Emirates ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.