Mali vs Zambia: Vulnerability

Mali
6.8
in 2025
Zambia
6.7
in 2025
Mali rank
16th
Zambia rank
18th

Vulnerability over time

  • Mali
  • Zambia
02468201320192025

How they compare

Mali currently reports 6.8 against 6.7 in Zambia, a difference of 0.1.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 18th of 191 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 6.61 5.84 0.7714 Mali
2020s 7.05 6.38 0.6667 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerability, Mali or Zambia?
Mali, at 6.8 against 6.7 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerability between Mali and Zambia?
0.1, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zambia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Mali and Zambia rank globally for vulnerability?
Mali ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 18th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Zambia: Vulnerability. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerability/mali/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerability/mali/zambia/">Mali vs Zambia: Vulnerability</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerability
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
191 places, 2,474 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.