Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2.6 against 2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 148th and North Macedonia ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.1 | 2.04 | 1.06 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 2.88 | 2.2 | 0.6833 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 2.6 against 2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 0.1, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for vulnerability?
- Mongolia ranks 148th and North Macedonia ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.