Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turkmenistan: Vulnerability
Vulnerability over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 1.5 against 1.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th and Turkmenistan ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.46 | 1.71 | 0.2571 | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 1.62 | 1.6 | 0.0167 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 1.5 against 1.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerability between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkmenistan?
- 0.1, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkmenistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkmenistan rank globally for vulnerability?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th and Turkmenistan ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.