Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Liechtenstein: Waste — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.0149 kt
in 2023
Liechtenstein
0.0363 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
198th
Liechtenstein rank
195th

Waste — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Liechtenstein
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 0.0363 kt against 0.0149 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.0214 kt.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 2.4 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Liechtenstein ranks 195th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0195 kt 0 kt 0.0195 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
1970s 0.0226 kt 0.2261 kt 0.2035 kt Liechtenstein
1980s 0.0244 kt 0.2452 kt 0.2208 kt Liechtenstein
1990s 0.0222 kt 0.1606 kt 0.1384 kt Liechtenstein
2000s 0.0169 kt 0.0931 kt 0.0762 kt Liechtenstein
2010s 0.015 kt 0.0366 kt 0.0216 kt Liechtenstein
2020s 0.0149 kt 0.0364 kt 0.0215 kt Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 0.0363 kt against 0.0149 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Liechtenstein?
0.0214 kt, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Liechtenstein?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Liechtenstein rank globally for waste — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Liechtenstein ranks 195th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Liechtenstein: Waste — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/liechtenstein/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Liechtenstein: Waste — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,574 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf