Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.0149 kt
in 2023
Tokelau
0.0089 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
198th
Tokelau rank
199th

Waste — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Tokelau
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.0149 kt against 0.0089 kt in Tokelau, a difference of 0.006 kt.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 1.7 times Tokelau's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Tokelau ranks 199th of 201 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Tokelau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0195 kt 0.0076 kt 0.0119 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
1970s 0.0226 kt 0.0071 kt 0.0155 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
1980s 0.0244 kt 0.0094 kt 0.015 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
1990s 0.0222 kt 0.0099 kt 0.0123 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2000s 0.0169 kt 0.0082 kt 0.0087 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.015 kt 0.0079 kt 0.0071 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.0149 kt 0.0088 kt 0.0061 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Tokelau?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.0149 kt against 0.0089 kt in Tokelau as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Tokelau?
0.006 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Tokelau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Tokelau rank globally for waste — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Tokelau ranks 199th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/tokelau/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,574 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf