Azerbaijan vs Sweden: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 112 kt against 106 kt in Azerbaijan, a difference of 6 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60.05 kt | 200.62 kt | 140.57 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 73.15 kt | 179.8 kt | 106.65 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 95.62 kt | 119.2 kt | 23.58 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 104.5 kt | 112.25 kt | 7.75 kt | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Azerbaijan or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 112 kt against 106 kt in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Azerbaijan and Sweden?
- 6 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Sweden rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf