Belgium vs Costa Rica: Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Waste — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belgium
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 81.2 kt against 76.2 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 5 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 108th and Costa Rica ranks 110th of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 115.42 kt | 52.18 kt | 63.24 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 89.23 kt | 62.63 kt | 26.6 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 84.8 kt | 73.88 kt | 10.92 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Belgium or Costa Rica?
- Belgium, at 81.2 kt against 76.2 kt in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Belgium and Costa Rica?
- 5 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Costa Rica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Costa Rica rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 108th and Costa Rica ranks 110th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf