Comoros vs Montenegro: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Comoros
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 5.52 kt against 5.38 kt in Comoros, a difference of 0.14 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 186th and Montenegro ranks 184th of 232 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.56 kt | 4.89 kt | 1.33 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 4.34 kt | 5.5 kt | 1.17 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 5.19 kt | 5.5 kt | 0.3125 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Comoros or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 5.52 kt against 5.38 kt in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Comoros and Montenegro?
- 0.14 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Montenegro rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Comoros ranks 186th and Montenegro ranks 184th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf