Congo vs Eritrea: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 25.8 kt against 23.2 kt in Eritrea, a difference of 2.6 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Congo ranks 142nd and Eritrea ranks 145th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.03 kt | 12.73 kt | 1.7 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 14.48 kt | 15.26 kt | 0.78 kt | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 20.94 kt | 19.49 kt | 1.45 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 24.93 kt | 22.55 kt | 2.38 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Congo or Eritrea?
- Congo, at 25.8 kt against 23.2 kt in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Congo and Eritrea?
- 2.6 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Congo ranks 142nd and Eritrea ranks 145th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf