Finland vs Kyrgyzstan: Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Waste — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Finland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 85.3 kt against 84.5 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.8 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th of 232 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 232.25 kt | 38.6 kt | 193.65 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 189.4 kt | 52.33 kt | 137.07 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 143.2 kt | 68.4 kt | 74.8 kt | Finland |
| 2020s | 112.08 kt | 83.33 kt | 28.75 kt | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Finland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Finland, at 85.3 kt against 84.5 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.8 kt, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Finland ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf