Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Georgia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 58.4 kt against 54 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.4 kt.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 232 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.77 kt | 38.42 kt | 18.35 kt | Georgia |
| 2000s | 55.47 kt | 40.44 kt | 15.03 kt | Georgia |
| 2010s | 53.75 kt | 45.27 kt | 8.48 kt | Georgia |
| 2020s | 57.48 kt | 52.38 kt | 5.1 kt | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
- Georgia, at 58.4 kt against 54 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 4.4 kt, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Georgia ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf