Ghana vs Kyrgyzstan: Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Waste — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Ghana
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 84.5 kt against 83.4 kt in Ghana, a difference of 1.1 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 105th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.16 kt | 38.6 kt | 10.56 kt | Ghana |
| 2000s | 56.43 kt | 52.33 kt | 4.1 kt | Ghana |
| 2010s | 71.27 kt | 68.4 kt | 2.87 kt | Ghana |
| 2020s | 81.3 kt | 83.33 kt | 2.03 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Ghana or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 84.5 kt against 83.4 kt in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Ghana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.1 kt, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Ghana ranks 105th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf