Which has higher waste — emissions, Holy See or Tokelau?

Tokelau, at 0.0089 kt against 0.0031 kt in Holy See as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Tokelau?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Holy See vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions (CH4)

Holy See

0.0031 kt

in 2023

Tokelau

0.0089 kt

in 2023

Holy See rank

231st

Tokelau rank

230th

Waste — Emissions (CH4) over time

Holy See
Tokelau

How they compare

Tokelau currently reports 0.0089 kt against 0.0031 kt in Holy See, a difference of 0.0058 kt.

That makes Tokelau's figure about 2.9 times Holy See's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tokelau ahead.

Holy See ranks 231st and Tokelau ranks 230th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Holy See averaged higher in 5 and Tokelau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Holy See	Tokelau	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0109 kt	0.0076 kt	0.0033 kt	Holy See
1970s	0.0128 kt	0.0071 kt	0.0057 kt	Holy See
1980s	0.012 kt	0.0094 kt	0.0026 kt	Holy See
1990s	0.011 kt	0.0099 kt	0.0011 kt	Holy See
2000s	0.0096 kt	0.0082 kt	0.0014 kt	Holy See
2010s	0.0055 kt	0.0079 kt	0.0024 kt	Tokelau
2020s	0.0035 kt	0.0088 kt	0.0053 kt	Tokelau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions, Holy See or Tokelau?: Tokelau, at 0.0089 kt against 0.0031 kt in Holy See as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions between Holy See and Tokelau?: 0.0058 kt, with Tokelau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Tokelau?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Holy See and Tokelau rank globally for waste — emissions?: Holy See ranks 231st and Tokelau ranks 230th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Holy See vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/holy-see/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/holy-see/tokelau/">Holy See vs Tokelau: Waste — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Waste — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf