Luxembourg vs Tonga: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Luxembourg
- Tonga
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1.61 kt against 1.28 kt in Tonga, a difference of 0.33 kt.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Tonga's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 199th and Tonga ranks 202nd of 232 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.02 kt | 1.11 kt | 2.91 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 3.06 kt | 1.2 kt | 1.86 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1.78 kt | 1.27 kt | 0.51 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Luxembourg or Tonga?
- Luxembourg, at 1.61 kt against 1.28 kt in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 0.33 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Tonga rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Luxembourg ranks 199th and Tonga ranks 202nd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf