Argentina vs Belarus: Waste — Emissions (CO2)
Waste — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 12.3 kt against 12 kt in Argentina, a difference of 0.3 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Argentina ranks 57th and Belarus ranks 56th of 169 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.41 kt | 8.46 kt | 0.0488 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 9.49 kt | 25.24 kt | 15.75 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 10.89 kt | 48.21 kt | 37.32 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 11.78 kt | 15.65 kt | 3.88 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Argentina or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 12.3 kt against 12 kt in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Argentina and Belarus?
- 0.3 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Argentina ranks 57th and Belarus ranks 56th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf