Austria vs Montenegro: Waste — Emissions (CO2)
Waste — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Austria
- Montenegro
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.834 kt against 0.603 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 0.231 kt.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.4 times Montenegro's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 115th and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.92 kt | 0.5025 kt | 2.42 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.834 kt | 0.6003 kt | 0.2337 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.834 kt | 0.6038 kt | 0.2302 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Austria or Montenegro?
- Austria, at 0.834 kt against 0.603 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Austria and Montenegro?
- 0.231 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Montenegro rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Austria ranks 115th and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf