Azerbaijan vs Moldova: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Moldova
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 2.45 kt against 2.41 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0.04 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Moldova ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Moldova ranks 92nd of 169 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.62 kt | 1.77 kt | 0.1462 kt | Moldova |
| 2000s | 1.78 kt | 2.02 kt | 0.243 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | 2.13 kt | 2.41 kt | 0.284 kt | Moldova |
| 2020s | 2.4 kt | 2.42 kt | 0.02 kt | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Azerbaijan or Moldova?
- Azerbaijan, at 2.45 kt against 2.41 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Azerbaijan and Moldova?
- 0.04 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Moldova rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Moldova ranks 92nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf