Belgium vs New Zealand: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2.33 kt against 2.15 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 0.18 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 145 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.82 kt | 2.84 kt | 11.98 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 3.57 kt | 2.41 kt | 1.16 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2.23 kt | 2.21 kt | 0.025 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Belgium or New Zealand?
- Belgium, at 2.33 kt against 2.15 kt in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Belgium and New Zealand?
- 0.18 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf