Cuba vs Montenegro: Waste — Emissions (CO2)
Waste — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Cuba
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.603 kt against 0.482 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.121 kt.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 120th and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4672 kt | 0.5025 kt | 0.0353 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.4753 kt | 0.6003 kt | 0.125 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.4812 kt | 0.6038 kt | 0.1225 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Cuba or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.603 kt against 0.482 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Cuba and Montenegro?
- 0.121 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Montenegro rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 120th and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf