Egypt vs Montenegro: Waste — Emissions (CO2)
Waste — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Egypt
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.603 kt against 0.452 kt in Egypt, a difference of 0.151 kt.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 121st and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.336 kt | 0.5025 kt | 0.1665 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.3865 kt | 0.6003 kt | 0.2138 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.4405 kt | 0.6038 kt | 0.1633 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Egypt or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.603 kt against 0.452 kt in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Egypt and Montenegro?
- 0.151 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Montenegro rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Egypt ranks 121st and Montenegro ranks 118th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf