Belgium vs Kyrgyzstan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2,570 kt against 2,462 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 108 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 106th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 109th of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,516 kt | 1,541 kt | 1,975 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,794 kt | 2,002 kt | 791.65 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2,671 kt | 2,428 kt | 243.18 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belgium, at 2,570 kt against 2,462 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 108 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 106th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 109th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf