Belgium vs Somalia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 2,651 kt against 2,570 kt in Belgium, a difference of 81 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 103rd of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,516 kt | 1,484 kt | 2,032 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,794 kt | 2,059 kt | 734.82 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2,671 kt | 2,537 kt | 134.1 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 2,651 kt against 2,570 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Somalia?
- 81 kt, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Somalia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Somalia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 103rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf