Georgia vs Serbia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,778 kt against 1,690 kt in Georgia, a difference of 88 kt.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 105th and Serbia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,607 kt | 1,762 kt | 155.12 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,558 kt | 1,768 kt | 210.04 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,664 kt | 1,769 kt | 105.21 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq), Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,778 kt against 1,690 kt in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) between Georgia and Serbia?
- 88 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq)?
- Georgia ranks 105th and Serbia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf