Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,778 kt against 1,684 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 94 kt.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 232 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,762 kt | 1,231 kt | 530.99 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,768 kt | 1,423 kt | 345.03 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,769 kt | 1,635 kt | 134.2 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq), Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Serbia, at 1,778 kt against 1,684 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 94 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq)?
- Serbia ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf