Belgium vs Mali: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Mali
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 294.15 kt against 286.2 kt in Mali, a difference of 7.95 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 75th and Mali ranks 77th of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 269.4 kt | 156.51 kt | 112.89 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 291.76 kt | 236.72 kt | 55.04 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 294.15 kt | 276.92 kt | 17.23 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Belgium or Mali?
- Belgium, at 294.15 kt against 286.2 kt in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Belgium and Mali?
- 7.95 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Mali?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Mali rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Belgium ranks 75th and Mali ranks 77th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf