Israel vs Sudan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time
- Israel
- Sudan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 696.95 kt against 654.55 kt in Sudan, a difference of 42.4 kt.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 42nd and Sudan ranks 44th of 232 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 590.29 kt | 494.89 kt | 95.4 kt | Israel |
| 2020s | 675.09 kt | 618.77 kt | 56.31 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Israel or Sudan?
- Israel, at 696.95 kt against 654.55 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Israel and Sudan?
- 42.4 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Sudan rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Israel ranks 42nd and Sudan ranks 44th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf