Pacific Islands Trust Territory vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)

Pacific Islands Trust Territory
0.4672 kt
in 1990
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.379 kt
in 2023
Pacific Islands Trust Territory rank
218th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
220th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time

  • Pacific Islands Trust Territory
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Pacific Islands Trust Territory currently reports 0.4672 kt against 0.379 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0882 kt.

That makes Pacific Islands Trust Territory's figure about 1.2 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Pacific Islands Trust Territory has been ahead every year.

Pacific Islands Trust Territory ranks 218th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 220th of 232 countries.

Pacific Islands Trust Territory has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pacific Islands Trust Territory Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2681 kt 0.1107 kt 0.1574 kt Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1970s 0.3309 kt 0.1472 kt 0.1837 kt Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1980s 0.4172 kt 0.1665 kt 0.2507 kt Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1990s 0.4672 kt 0.1717 kt 0.2955 kt Pacific Islands Trust Territory

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Pacific Islands Trust Territory or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Pacific Islands Trust Territory, at 0.4672 kt against 0.379 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 1990.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Pacific Islands Trust Territory and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0882 kt, with Pacific Islands Trust Territory ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific Islands Trust Territory and Turks and Caicos Islands?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Pacific Islands Trust Territory and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Pacific Islands Trust Territory ranks 218th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 220th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pacific Islands Trust Territory vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/pacific-islands-trust-territory/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/pacific-islands-trust-territory/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Pacific Islands Trust Territory vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf