Armenia vs Mongolia: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.201 kt against 0.198 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0.003 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 155th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 232 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1314 kt | 0.1119 kt | 0.0194 kt | Armenia |
| 2000s | 0.1419 kt | 0.1198 kt | 0.0221 kt | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.1814 kt | 0.162 kt | 0.0194 kt | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.1975 kt | 0.1948 kt | 0.0028 kt | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 0.201 kt against 0.198 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 0.003 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 155th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf